<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for TransparentSmoke.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://TransparentSmoke.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://TransparentSmoke.com</link>
	<description>Technology News and our world - Can you see it? It&#039;s right in front of you!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 05:58:50 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Maxim should be Ashamed by miki</title>
		<link>http://TransparentSmoke.com/?p=98&#038;cpage=1#comment-2456</link>
		<dc:creator>miki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 05:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=98#comment-2456</guid>
		<description>well he didnt reall do much to her anyways. here is what i think the original is.. its almost the same as the mod. But then agein i guessed.
http://img173.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=33669_Untitled-1_122_114lo.jpg

also check out what this guy does. http://www.howmuch.co.nr/ 
he should have a tut pretty soon.. or so it seems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well he didnt reall do much to her anyways. here is what i think the original is.. its almost the same as the mod. But then agein i guessed.<br />
<a href="http://img173.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=33669_Untitled-1_122_114lo.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://img173.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=33669_Untitled-1_122_114lo.jpg</a></p>
<p>also check out what this guy does. <a href="http://www.howmuch.co.nr/" rel="nofollow">http://www.howmuch.co.nr/</a><br />
he should have a tut pretty soon.. or so it seems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Integrated Electronics by JagEsquire</title>
		<link>http://TransparentSmoke.com/?p=143&#038;cpage=1#comment-1144</link>
		<dc:creator>JagEsquire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 03:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://TransparentSmoke.com/?p=143#comment-1144</guid>
		<description>Found this on the web today. Excellent idea for those more dressed up days.
&lt;div class=&quot;aligncenter&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thomaspink.co.uk/us/product-details/?70104057R2X&quot; alt=&quot;Thomas Pink&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://transparentsmoke.com/wp-content/uploads/thomaspink.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Thomas Pink iPod Tie&quot;&gt;
Thomas Pink iPod Tie&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Found this on the web today. Excellent idea for those more dressed up days.</p>
<div class="aligncenter"><a href="http://www.thomaspink.co.uk/us/product-details/?70104057R2X" alt="Thomas Pink" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://transparentsmoke.com/wp-content/uploads/thomaspink.jpg" alt="Thomas Pink iPod Tie"/><br />
Thomas Pink iPod Tie</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Firefox &#8211; What is with the name? by JagEsquire</title>
		<link>http://TransparentSmoke.com/?p=135&#038;cpage=1#comment-1137</link>
		<dc:creator>JagEsquire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 17:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=135#comment-1137</guid>
		<description>Interesting stuff.

We too are now showing errors with Firefox 1.5.0.1.  It&#039;s too bad you didn&#039;t leave your name, We&#039;d have loved to provide you with some free swag for uncovering this error for us.  Next time please feel free to step forward without impunity.

To answer your un-asked question it looks to be errors with the padding just as we described in this article.

Thank you again for bringing this to our attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting stuff.</p>
<p>We too are now showing errors with Firefox 1.5.0.1.  It&#8217;s too bad you didn&#8217;t leave your name, We&#8217;d have loved to provide you with some free swag for uncovering this error for us.  Next time please feel free to step forward without impunity.</p>
<p>To answer your un-asked question it looks to be errors with the padding just as we described in this article.</p>
<p>Thank you again for bringing this to our attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Firefox &#8211; What is with the name? by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://TransparentSmoke.com/?p=135&#038;cpage=1#comment-1136</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 06:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=135#comment-1136</guid>
		<description>Hi, I found your page from www.kwantumwellness.com.  I was visiting that site today using my Mac and could *not* get it to work!  Safari wouldn&#039;t load it properly, Internet Explorer on Mac wouldn&#039;t load it properly (it&#039;s different than IE on the Windows platform), and FireFox wouldn&#039;t load it properly.  The only reason I kept trying is because I was curious how a website could be designed like this, I&#039;ve never seen such an incompatible website.  I then tried it on my Windows computer using FireFox to no avail, and only after using Internet Explorer was I able to view it properly.  Without getting into a discussion regarding which browser is better, or which computer manufacturer is better, I think it is in poor practice to ignore the issue of browser compatability all together, and especially to present FireFox, etc. users with a 403 message when going to one of your incompatible websites.  I think the solution lies in the designer learning the differences between how the browsers render the HTML code and using that education to create more compatible websites.  In addition, I think you will find that your clients will be happier knowing that &gt; 20% of their website visitors (FireFox, Safari, etc. all combined) aren&#039;t being turned away because their corporate website doesn&#039;t load properly.  Just some food for thought. [Sorry I didn&#039;t provide my name &amp; email address, but I would prefer to leave my comment as just that...a comment]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I found your page from <a href="http://www.kwantumwellness.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.kwantumwellness.com</a>.  I was visiting that site today using my Mac and could *not* get it to work!  Safari wouldn&#8217;t load it properly, Internet Explorer on Mac wouldn&#8217;t load it properly (it&#8217;s different than IE on the Windows platform), and FireFox wouldn&#8217;t load it properly.  The only reason I kept trying is because I was curious how a website could be designed like this, I&#8217;ve never seen such an incompatible website.  I then tried it on my Windows computer using FireFox to no avail, and only after using Internet Explorer was I able to view it properly.  Without getting into a discussion regarding which browser is better, or which computer manufacturer is better, I think it is in poor practice to ignore the issue of browser compatability all together, and especially to present FireFox, etc. users with a 403 message when going to one of your incompatible websites.  I think the solution lies in the designer learning the differences between how the browsers render the HTML code and using that education to create more compatible websites.  In addition, I think you will find that your clients will be happier knowing that &gt; 20% of their website visitors (FireFox, Safari, etc. all combined) aren&#8217;t being turned away because their corporate website doesn&#8217;t load properly.  Just some food for thought. [Sorry I didn't provide my name &amp; email address, but I would prefer to leave my comment as just that...a comment]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maxim should be Ashamed by scott</title>
		<link>http://TransparentSmoke.com/?p=98&#038;cpage=1#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2004 18:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=98#comment-374</guid>
		<description>Personally, I would like to know if anyone has a tutorial on enhnching breast with photoshop. If you do email me please. scaryflynmirglip@hotmail.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I would like to know if anyone has a tutorial on enhnching breast with photoshop. If you do email me please. <a href="mailto:scaryflynmirglip@hotmail.com">scaryflynmirglip@hotmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stop Microsoft from Spying by Rogue</title>
		<link>http://TransparentSmoke.com/?p=15&#038;cpage=1#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>Rogue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2004 06:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=15#comment-350</guid>
		<description>Good article, though some more info on the hosts file and what it does would be good for the newb..

In brief, *any* website domain that you find distasteful can be blocked via the hosts file, which is the first port of call when your system attempts to resolve an address. The 127.0.0.1 address is called a loopback address, as it refers to your own system.

And on the subject of spying.. sa.microsoft.com is Microsoft&#039;s search engine hookup (sa=search assistant) that sends M$ the search string for everything you type into the windows file finder. If you only block one host in your hosts file, let it be sa.microsoft.com !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article, though some more info on the hosts file and what it does would be good for the newb..</p>
<p>In brief, *any* website domain that you find distasteful can be blocked via the hosts file, which is the first port of call when your system attempts to resolve an address. The 127.0.0.1 address is called a loopback address, as it refers to your own system.</p>
<p>And on the subject of spying.. sa.microsoft.com is Microsoft&#8217;s search engine hookup (sa=search assistant) that sends M$ the search string for everything you type into the windows file finder. If you only block one host in your hosts file, let it be sa.microsoft.com !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stop Microsoft from Spying by kathy</title>
		<link>http://TransparentSmoke.com/?p=15&#038;cpage=1#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2004 21:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=15#comment-308</guid>
		<description>Particular trojan horse mentioned is nowt to do with microsoft. its actually called hacker defender, and was inadvertently downloaded while looking for antispy software to stop microsoft from accessing my system. There is a very complicated way to get rid of it, but an easier way is to back up to disc, and re-install windows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Particular trojan horse mentioned is nowt to do with microsoft. its actually called hacker defender, and was inadvertently downloaded while looking for antispy software to stop microsoft from accessing my system. There is a very complicated way to get rid of it, but an easier way is to back up to disc, and re-install windows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Hosts File by CLM</title>
		<link>http://TransparentSmoke.com/?p=20&#038;cpage=1#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>CLM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2004 22:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=20#comment-304</guid>
		<description>Nice work, I looked everywhere for this and I love how many you had the I was already blocking, plus 1,000&#039;s more.  THANKS for making this available to everyone!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work, I looked everywhere for this and I love how many you had the I was already blocking, plus 1,000&#8217;s more.  THANKS for making this available to everyone!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stop Microsoft from Spying by kathy</title>
		<link>http://TransparentSmoke.com/?p=15&#038;cpage=1#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2004 23:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=15#comment-299</guid>
		<description>they,ve buggered up the system since my husband looked into what your saying. but am in agreement with you . virus trogan horse is here at the moment. but hopefully he,s cleverer than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they,ve buggered up the system since my husband looked into what your saying. but am in agreement with you . virus trogan horse is here at the moment. but hopefully he,s cleverer than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reset BIOS Password by Maninder Singh</title>
		<link>http://TransparentSmoke.com/?p=60&#038;cpage=1#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>Maninder Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2004 11:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=60#comment-292</guid>
		<description>Thanx. It worked. Great Job Done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanx. It worked. Great Job Done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
