Comments on: Maxim should be Ashamed

By: miki

miki — Fri, 17 Aug 2007 05:58:50 +0000

well he didnt reall do much to her anyways. here is what i think the original is.. its almost the same as the mod. But then agein i guessed.
http://img173.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=33669_Untitled-1_122_114lo.jpg

also check out what this guy does. http://www.howmuch.co.nr/
he should have a tut pretty soon.. or so it seems.

By: scott

scott — Fri, 10 Sep 2004 18:08:00 +0000

Personally, I would like to know if anyone has a tutorial on enhnching breast with photoshop. If you do email me please. scaryflynmirglip@hotmail.com

By: John

John — Wed, 17 Dec 2003 02:51:12 +0000

moron, read.

By: ANIMAL

ANIMAL — Mon, 15 Dec 2003 06:33:31 +0000

PERSONALLY I DO NOT SEE THE REASON THIS GUY IS COMPLAINING ABOUT A PICTURE OF KATA DOBO BEING EDITED. WHAT PERSONAL AFFRONT DOES THIS CAUSE YOU DUDE? ARE YOU MENTAL, OR ARE YOU JUST SO WRAPPED UP ON THIS NOBODY MODEL? WHO THE HELL IS KATA DOBO ANYWAY? OTHER THAN AN ANOREXIC, NASTY, NO TITTS, NO ASS, NO HIPS, FAKE ASS, TRAMP WHO TOOK ALMOST ALL OF HER CLOTHES OFF FOR WHAT? SO WE COULD REGURGITATE WHILE MR. I’M AFFRONTED GETS THE BIGGEST BONER OF HIS LIFE. IF I WERE YOUR WIFE I WOULD SLAP YOU! WHY DON’T YOU GO PAY THAT KIND OF ATTENTION TO HER AND STOP KISSING THIS NOBODY NEWBE MODEL’S ASS, APPARENTLY ALL YOU ARE CONCERNED WITH IS DRINKING SOME OF JUAN VALDEZ’S FINEST WITH HER CAUSE YOU HAVE A CRUSH. DUDE YOU HAVE A WIFE AT HOME GET A LIFE IF YOU CAN’T GET DOBO OUT OF YOUR HEAD THINK MAN, THINK, AS LONG AS YOUR WIFE IS THE RECIPIENT YOU CAN HAVE ANYONE YOU WANT WITHIN THE CONFINES OF YOUR HEAD, AND IT’S ALL GOOD AS LONG AS YOUR WIFE IS THE ONE UNDERNEATH YOU. SO SHUT UP WITH THE INSANITY GET THIS NOBODY MODEL OUT OF YOUR SYSTEM AND LET MAXIM ALONE. IF YOU ARE SO AFFRONTED THEN CANCEL YOUR SUBSCRIPTION AND GO SCREW YOURSELF.

By: Your Owner

Your Owner — Fri, 12 Dec 2003 06:00:58 +0000

You’re a moron. If you don’t like hot girls, call the 800 number on the first few pages of Maxim and have your subscription cancelled. Fag!

By: dj

dj — Thu, 04 Dec 2003 02:45:37 +0000

it’s a real graphic, but the morphing in the background is to give more shape and focus on the foreground image which is that of the chick…

By: John

John — Mon, 24 Nov 2003 08:23:29 +0000

To be completely frank, I think it is a fun exercise to look for mistakes in professional media. It is assumed that the material is going to be altered; the idea is to find new pleasure in the material. Lets be honest, if youre getting off on porn, then you really are sad.

Soren Kierkegaard in his book Either/Or has a wonderful chapter titled Crop Rotation, and I think some of these commentators could learn something from it. This project of finding flaws in the artwork is a way of remaining interested in otherwise dull material.

There is not a beautiful woman in the picture, there is poor trick fauxtography bested by the primitive materials Buster Keaton had to work with. Keep looking for poor craftsmanship in these insults to the palate, and you’ll apppreciate the real women more. That digital photo can’t cook, can’t join you at the movies, can’t talk to you on a romantic walk. All it can do is arouse the uneducated.

By: JP

JP — Wed, 19 Nov 2003 02:24:51 +0000

I wish that my pictures could be touched up like that so it looks like I have huge boobs too.

hell, she’s got no _tits_. What is it with these anorexic women today?

Wait, I’m confused: which talking point are we supposed to be using again?

By: Uassholes

Uassholes — Wed, 19 Nov 2003 00:27:05 +0000

I don’t subscribe to Maxim.
This girl is beautiful..whats her name?

Its just a photo of a women is bare clothes. What the hell are you looking at the damn microscopic errors for?? You think Maxim pick up some bitch off the street and fuck her up with photoshop?

I thought you were pointing out armpit hairs. Damn,.
Kneel down , apologize and lick the wall right now.

By: Yanko

Yanko — Tue, 18 Nov 2003 19:06:59 +0000

Fuck this kind of magazines